4.5 Article

Towards Prediction of In Vivo Intestinal Absorption Using a 96-Well Caco-2 Assay

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 99, 期 7, 页码 3246-3265

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.22080

关键词

Caco-2 cells; intestinal absorption; recovery; permeability; P-glycoprotein; para-cellular transport; efflux pumps; bioavailability; ADME; in vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We systematically validated a robust 96-well Caco-2 assay via an extended set of 93 marketed drugs with diverse transport mechanisms and quantified by LC/MS/MS, to investigate its predictive utility while dealing with challenging discovery compounds. Utilizing nonlinear fit, the validation led to a good correlation (R-2= 0.76) between absorptive permeability, log -P-app(A-B), from in vitro Caco-2 assay and reported human fraction of dose absorbed. We observed that paracellular compounds could be flagged by logP(app)(A-B) (<-5.5 cm/s) and physicochemical property space (c logP < 1). Of 8000 Novartis discovery compounds examined 13% were subject to low recovery (<30%). Compound loss was investigated by comparing cell monolayer and artificial membrane, while 0.5% bovine serum albumin (in both donor and acceptor compartments) was utilized to improve recovery. The second focus of this study was to investigate the advantages and limitations of the current Caco-2 assay for predicting in vivo intestinal absorption. Caco-2 measurements for compounds with high aqueous solubility and low in vitro metabolic clearance were compared to 88 in vivo rat bioavailability studies. Despite the challenges posed by discovery compounds with suboptimal physicochemical properties, Caco-2 data successfully projected low intestinal absorption. This platform sets the stage for mechanistically evaluating compounds towards improving in vitro in vivo correlations. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci99:3246-3265, 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据