4.5 Article

Modeling Microstructure Development and Release Kinetics in Controlled Drug Release Coatings

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 98, 期 1, 页码 169-186

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21416

关键词

controlled release/delivery; thermodynamics; dissolution; diffusion; in silico modeling; mathematical model; solubility; biodegradable polymers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, controlled release coatings, comprised of drug-polymer composites, have been integrated with medical devices, improving device functionality and performance. However, relationships between material properties, manufacturing environment, composite (micro)structure, and subsequent release kinetics are not well established. We apply a thermodynamically consistent model to probe the influence of drug-polymer chemistry (phobicity), drug loading, and evaporation rate on microstructure development during fabrication. For these structures, we compute release profiles for exposure to polymer-insoluble media and media in which the polymer readily dissolves. We find that with increasing drug-polymer phobicity, structural heterogeneities form at lower loadings and more rapid rates. The heterogeneities remain isolated and compact at low loadings and become interconnected as the drug to polymer ratio approaches 1.0. Release into polymer-insoluble media was dramatically enhanced by heterogeneities, resulting in up to a fourfold increase in drug release. In polymer-soluble media, however, heterogeneities diminished release. Although reductions of only 30% were typically observed, the absolute changes were much larger than observed in polymer-insoluble media. Our results suggest that improved comprehension and quantification of the pbysico-chemical properties in controlled release systems will enable the microstructure to be tailored to achieve desired responses that are insensitive to manufacturing variations. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 98:169-186, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据