4.7 Article

Is the X(3915) the xc0(2P)?

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 91, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.057501

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute for Basic Science (Korea) [IBS-R016-D1]
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [IBS-R016-D1-2015-A00] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Particle Data Group Meson Summary Table lists the X(3915) meson, omega J/psi. mass peak seen in B -> K omega J/psi decays and gamma gamma -> omega J/psi two-photon fusion reactions, as the x(c0)(2P), the 2(3)P(0) charmonium state. Here, with some reasonable assumptions, it is shown that if the X(3915) is the x(c0)(2P), the measured strength of the gamma gamma -> X(3915) signal implies an upper limit on the branching fraction B(x(c0)(2P) -> omega J/psi) that is below a lower limit inferred for the same quantity from the B -> KX(3915) decay rate. Also, the absence any signal for X(3915) -> D-0(D) over bar (0) in B+ -> (K+D0)(D) over bar (0) decays is used to infer the limit B(X(3915) -> D-0(D) over bar (0)) < 1.2 x B(X(3915) -> omega J/psi). This contradicts expectations that x(c0)(2P) decays to D-0<(D)over bar>(0) should be a dominant process, while decays to omega J/psi, which are Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka suppressed, should be relatively rare. These, plus reasons given earlier by Guo and Meissner, raise concerns about the X(3915) = x(c0)(2P) assignment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据