4.5 Article

pH-dependent interactions of indinavir and lipids in nanoparticlies and their ability to entrap a solute

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 97, 期 2, 页码 931-943

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21020

关键词

indinavir; PMPA; lipid-indinavir interaction; pH-dependent release; drug delivery; drug incorporation

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 00166] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 56548] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 52663] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES 07033] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 62883] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 39178] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have investigated the ability of lipid-indinavir particles composed of 3-to- 1 lipid-drug molar ratio to encapsulate an aqueous marker calcein and anti-HIV drug H-3-phosphonylmethoxypropyl-adenine (PMPA). Even at a high density of indinavir associated to lipid-indinavir nanoparticles, they form an enclosed lipid membrane that allows encapsulation of calcein and PMPA in an aqueous compartment. At neutral pH, practically all indinavir was incorporated into lipid bilayer and lipid associated indinavir can be dissociated with half-maximum pH recorded between 5.2 and 5.5. pH-Dependent release of indinavir did not influence calcein release significantly. However, pH-dependent release of indinavir affected PMPA release. By lowering pH, PMPA release was enhanced in the presence of indinavir in the lipid bilayer. Collectively, these data indicate that indinavir incorporated in lipid particles provides (1) stable bilayers capable of encapsulating other hydrophilic drugs, (2) ability to dissociate indinavir (which is acid stable) from lipid membranes, by lowering the pH, and (3) enabling enhancement in pH-dependent release of aqueous contents. However, the degree of pH-dependent release could be related to the charge and size of an aqueous molecule. (C) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据