4.6 Article

Quantitative analysis of flavonoids, alkaloids and saponins of Banxia Xiexin decoction using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.10.002

关键词

Flavonoids; Alkaloids; Saponins; Determination; Banxia Xiexin decoction

资金

  1. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [11ZZ110, 2012JW06]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [12ZR1431500]
  3. Construction Program for Innovative Research Team in Shanghai Institutions of Higher Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Banxia Xiexin decoction (BXD) is an effective Chinese Medicinal Prescription in treating gastroenteritis diseases. In this study an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed to separate and determine 18 major active ingredients of BXD in order to guarantee quality. The separation of ten flavonoids, four alkaloids and four saponins was accomplished on an Acquity BEH C18 (2.1 mm x 100 mm, 1.7 mu m) column using gradient elution with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid water (A) and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in methanol (B). All the analytes were detected in positive electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry by selective reaction monitoring (SRM) mode. A good linear regression relationship for each analyte was obtained over the range from 2.41-438 ng/ml to 20.75-4150 ng/ml. The precision was evaluated by intra- and inter-day assays with relative standard deviation (RSD) less than 7.7%. The recovery measured at three concentration levels varied from 92.4% to 107.8%. The method sensitivity expressed as LOQ was typically 0.97-4.15 ng/ml. The assay was successfully applied for determination of the 18 bioactive compounds in BXD. The results indicated that the new UPLC-MS/MS method was rapid and accurate, and could be reliably utilized as a quality control method for BXD. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据