4.6 Article

Magnetic particle-based chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay for free thyroxine in human serum

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.06.011

关键词

Free thyroxine; Magnetic particles; Chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay; Horseradish peroxidase; Human serum

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [90813015]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2007CB714507]
  3. National Key Technology R D Program [2006AA02Z4A8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A magnetic particles-based chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay with high sensitivity, specificity, rapidity, and reproducibility was developed for the determination of free thyroxine in human serum. A competitive assay has been proposed with horseradish peroxidase labeled thyroxine analog. The immuno-magnetic particles coated with anti-fluorescein isothiocyanate antibody was used as dispersed solid phase and separation means for the immunoassay. Experimental conditions, such as temperature, the volume of magnetic particles and substrate, incubation time, dilution ratio and other relevant variables upon the immunoassay have been examined and optimized. The proposed method exhibited high performance which the linear range was 1.59-122 pmol L-1 and the detection limit was 0.25 pmol L-1. A coefficient of variance of less than 15% was obtained for both intra-assay and inter-assay precision. The present method has been successfully applied to the analysis of free thyroxine in human serum. The diagnostic accordance rate of the method for normal serum, hyperthyroidism, and hypothyroidism are satisfactory. Good correlations were obtained between the results by the proposed method and the commercial radioimmunoassay kit. The present method exhibits good potential in the fabrication of FT4 diagnostic kits which could be used in the clinical analysis and facilitated the development of automated operation systems in the clinical practice. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据