4.4 Article

Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors reduce collagen gel contraction and α-smooth muscle actin expression by periodontal ligament cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 266-274

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2008.01127.x

关键词

matrix metalloproteinase; matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors; periodontal ligament; zymography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Orthodontic tooth movement requires remodeling of the periodontal tissues. The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) degrade the extracellular matrix components of the periodontal ligament, while the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) control their activity. Synthetic MMP inhibitors have been developed to inhibit MMP activity. In this study, periodontal ligament cells in contracting collagen gels served as a model for enhanced periodontal remodeling. The effect of MMP inhibitors on gel contraction and on MMP and TIMP expression was analyzed. Human periodontal ligament cells were cultured in three-dimensional collagen gels and incubated with the MMP inhibitors BB94, CMT-3, doxycycline and Ilomastat. Gel contraction was determined using consecutive photographs. The relative amounts of MMPs and TIMPs were analyzed using substrate zymography and mRNA expression using quantitative polyermase chain reaction. All MMP inhibitors reduced MMP activity to about 20% of the control activity. They all reduced contraction, but CMT-3 and doxycycline had the strongest effect. These inhibitors also reduced MMP-2, MMP-3 and alpha-smooth muscle actin mRNA expression. The expression of MMP-1 mRNA seemed to be increased by CMT-3. No effects were found on the amounts of MMPs and TIMPs. Synthetic MMP inhibitors strongly reduced gel contraction by periodontal ligament cells. This was primarily caused by an inhibitory effect on MMP activity, which reduces matrix remodeling. In addition, alpha-smooth muscle actin expression was reduced by CMT-3 and doxycycline, which limits the contractile activity of the fibroblasts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据