4.7 Article

Response of rhizosphere microbial community structure and diversity to heavy metal co-pollution in arable soil

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 99, 期 19, 页码 8259-8269

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-6662-6

关键词

Soil pollution; Heavy metals; Rhizosphere; PCR-DGGE; Microbial community

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51378190, 50908079, 51039001]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [10JJ7005]
  3. Scholarship Award for Excellent Doctoral Student - Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the emerging environmental issues related to heavy metals, concern about the soil quality of farming lands near manufacturing district is increasing. Investigating the function of soil microorganisms exposed to long-term heavy metal contamination is meaningful and important for agricultural soil utilization. This article studied the potential influence of several heavy metals on microbial biomass, activity, abundance, and community composition in arable soil near industrial estate in Zhuzhou, Hunan province, China. The results showed that soil organic contents (SOC) were significantly positive correlated with heavy metals, whereas dehydrogenase activity (DHA) was greatly depressed by the heavy metal stress. Negative correlation was found between heavy metals and basal soil respiration (BSR), and no correlation was found between heavy metals and microbial biomass content (MBC). The quantitative PCR (QPCR) and polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) analysis could suggest that heavy metal pollution has significantly decreased abundance of bacteria and fungi and also changed their community structure. The results could contribute to evaluate heavy metal pollution level in soil. By combining different environmental parameters, it would promote the better understanding of heavy metal effect on the size, structure, and activity of microbial community in arable soil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据