4.2 Article

Structural analysis of the pyroglutamate-modified isoform of the Alzheimer's disease-related amyloid-β using NMR spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEPTIDE SCIENCE
卷 18, 期 11, 页码 691-695

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/psc.2456

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; aggregation; TFE; membrane-mimicking solvent; a-helical structure

资金

  1. Forschungszentrum Julich
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [GRK1033]
  3. Cluster Industrial Biotechnology-Graduate School
  4. Research School BioStruct
  5. International Helmholtz Research School of Biophysics and Soft Matter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aggregation of the A beta plays a fundamental role in the pathology of AD. Recently, N-terminally modified A beta species, pE-A beta, have been described as major constituents of A beta deposits in the brains of AD patients. pE-A beta has an increased aggregation propensity and shows increased toxicity compared with A beta 1-40 and A beta 1-42. In the present work, high-resolution NMR spectroscopy was performed to study pE-A beta 3-40 in aqueous TFE-containing solution. Two-dimensional TOCSY and NOESY experiments were performed. On the basis of NOE and chemical shift data, pE-A beta 3-40 was shown to contain two helical regions formed by residues 1422 and 3036. This is similar as previously described for A beta 1-40. However, the secondary chemical shift data indicate decreased helical propensity in pE-A beta 3-40 when compared with A beta 1-40 under exactly the same conditions. This is in agreement with the observation that pE-A beta 3-40 shows a drastically increased tendency to form beta-sheet-rich structures under more physiologic conditions. Structural studies of pE-A beta are crucial for better understanding the structural basis of amyloid fibril formation in the brain during development of AD, especially because an increasing number of reports indicate a decisive role of pE-A beta for the pathogenesis of AD. Copyright (c) 2012 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据