4.6 Article

Body Fat and Bone Mineral Content of Infants Fed Breast Milk, Cow's Milk Formula, or Soy Formula during the First Year of Life

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 163, 期 1, 页码 49-54

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.12.067

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Agriculture Research Service [CRIS 6251-51000-07D]
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To characterize growth, fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), and bone mineral content (BMC) longitudinally in healthy infants fed breast milk (BM), cow's milk formula (CMF), or soy formula (SF) during the first year of life. Study design Infants were assessed at age 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Growth was evaluated using standard anthropometric techniques, and body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Mixed-effects models with repeated measures were used, adjusting for race, socioeconomic status, gestational age, birth weight, birth length, sex, age, and diet history. Results Compared with infants fed formulas, infants fed BM had higher FM at age 3 months, and lower FFM at age 6-12 months (P < .001). Infants fed SF had greater FFM at age 6 months and 9 months compared with infants fed CMF (P < .001). BMC was higher in infants fed BM and lower in infants fed SF at age 3 months (P < .001), but by age 12 months, BMC was significantly higher in infants fed SF. Conclusion Infants fed CMF and SF had significantly different fat and bone accretion trajectories, and all infants fed formula were significantly different from infants fed BM. Infants fed SF had a leaner body phenotype throughout the first year of life, lower bone mineralization by age 3 months, and greater bone mineral accretion during the first year of life compared with infants fed BM or CMF. Although the body composition profiles are strikingly different in these 3 diet groups, the implications for long-term health outcomes and bone health remain unclear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据