4.6 Article

Neonatal and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Infants with Histologic Chorioamnionitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 158, 期 3, 页码 397-402

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.09.010

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stollery Children's Hospital Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To determine survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 months corrected age among very low birth weight infants <= 32 weeks gestation with histologic chorioamnionitis. Study design Observational, regionalized, single-center cohort study with prospective follow-up. Results Of the 628 infants meeting the selection criteria, 303 (48%) were born to mothers with evidence of histologic chorioamnonitis. Neonates with histologic chorioamnonitis were of lower gestational age and birth weight. On univariate analysis, they were more likely to have hypotension, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, severe retinopathy of prematurity, early-onset sepsis, and death. Infants with histologic chorioamnonitis were more likely to have any neurodevelopmental impairment, specifically, mental delay with a lower mental developmental index. When adjusting for perinatal variables, histologic chorioamnonitis had a protective effect on mortality rates (adjusted OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24-0.8; P = .01; n = 619), had a nonsignificant effect on neurodevelopmental impairment (adjusted odds ratio = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.82-2.17; P = .25; n = 496), and was associated with a 4-point lower mental developmental index at 18-months follow-up (adjusted difference -3.93, 95% CI: -7.52 to -0.33; P = .03; n = 496). Conclusions Although infants with histologic chorioamnonitis were at an increased risk for death and neurodevelopmental impairment, after multivariate analyses, histologic chorioamnonitis was not associated with adverse long-term outcomes. Results suggest fetal protection from treatment-responsive maternal infection and inflammation. (J Pediatr 2011;158:397-402).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据