4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

A comparative analysis of human mesenchymal stem cell response to hypoxia in vitro: Implications to translational strategies

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
卷 49, 期 6, 页码 915-918

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.01.023

关键词

Mesenchymal stem cells; Hypoxia; Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; Adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells; Cord blood mesenchymal stem cells; Amniotic mesenchymal stem cells; Tissue engineering; Regenerative medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are particularly valuable for structural tissue replacement. We compared the response to hypoxia among human MSCs derived from four different clinically relevant sources as an adjunct to translational developments. Methods: Immunophenotypically indistinguishable human MSC lineages derived from bone marrow (bmMSCs), adipose tissue (adMSCs), amniotic fluid (afMSCs), and umbilical cord blood (cbMSCs) were submitted to either room air or 1% O-2, under otherwise standard culture conditions. Cell expansion and quantitative RT-PCR data were obtained at different time points. Statistical analysis was by two-way mixed model and the F-test (P < 0.05). Results: The effect of hypoxia on expansion kinetics was dependent on cell source. Only prenatal sources of MSCs - afMSCs (P = 0.002) and cbMSCs (P < 0.001) - proliferated significantly faster under hypoxia than normoxia. Increased HIF1-alpha expression correlated consistently with increased cell expansion only among afMSCs. There were no significant variabilities in Survivin, Oct-4, and VEGF expressions. Conclusions: Mesenchymal stem cell tolerance to hypoxia in vitro varies with cell source. Prenatal cells, particularly those derived from amniotic fluid, are more robust than their postnatal counterparts. HIF1-alpha may play a role in the amniotic fluid-derived cells' enhanced response. These findings should inform the choice of mesenchymal stem cells for prospective regenerative strategies. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据