4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

In vitro tissue engineering of smooth muscle sheets with peristalsis using a murine induced pluripotent stem cell line

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 329-335

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.11.027

关键词

Short gut; Smooth muscle; Induced pleuripotent stem cells (iPS); Tissue engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Currently, therapeutic options for short gut syndrome are limited, ranging from total parenteral nutrition pending intestinal adaption to small bowel transplantation with its associated problems of rejection. The aim of this study was to differentiate murine induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into gut tissues, including contracting smooth muscle, as a precursor to using tissue engineering techniques to generate functioning intestinal tissue from the patient's own cells. Method: Induced pluripotent stem cells were cultured for 6 days in low adherent 96-well plates (500-5000 cells per well) in a differentiation medium comprising Knockout Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, L-glutamine, nonessential amino acids, 2-mercaptoethanol, penicillin, and streptomycin. After 6 days, the embryoid body that had formed in each well was transferred into a 12-well plate, each well containing 8 embryoid bodies. Results: Outgrowth culture produced differentiated cell clusters, including cardiaclike cells, sheets of smooth muscle with peristalticlike activity, and mucosal cells. Cardiaclike cells exhibited spontaneous rhythmic regular contraction, but the sheets of smooth muscle contracted in a co-ordinated way, just as is seen in peristaltic bowel, as shown using video imaging. Conclusion: Tissue engineering techniques using iPSCs have the potential to ultimately replace the need for small bowel transplantation and allow patients to grow their own small bowel. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据