4.1 Article

Upper Limbs Function After Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy in Children With Secondary Dystonia

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS
卷 29, 期 7, 页码 817-821

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b76a01

关键词

cerebral palsy; dystonia; intrathecal baclofen therapy; upper limb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Different studies show the efficacy of intrathecal baclofen therapy (ITB) in patients with secondary dystonia because of cerebral palsy. These studies only report improvements related to dystonia reduction; however, none of them have assessed whether such benefit is reflected in limb function. The purpose of our study is to determine whether the effects ITB therapy in patients with secondary dystonia to cerebral palsy, in addition to reducing dystonia, may also improve upper limb function. Methods: Eleven patients with secondary dystonia, classified as levels 3 and 4 of the Gross Motor Function Classification System, were treated with ITB. The mean age at implant was 11.3 (SD +/- 3.02) years. Before treatment and 12 months after implant, the patients were evaluated by the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb and the Barry Albright scale to assess upper limb function and dystonia, respectively. Results: We found a statistically significant improvement in both scales. The Melbourne scale total percentage score, for both limbs, increased in all patients (P < 0.05). Dystonia assessed by the Barry Albright scale scale decreased significantly by 15% from baseline to 12 months follow-up (P < 0.05). Conclusions: In patients with secondary dystonia treated with ITB, functional improvement of the upper limbs was observed in addition to dystonia reduction. In patients with secondary dystonia, ITB is a treatment that aims to achieve a general reduction of dystonia; this study want to show the influence that this reduction has to functional ability of patient. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study: level 4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据