4.6 Article

Spin-orbit interaction in GaAs wells: From one to two subbands

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 91, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.075408

关键词

-

资金

  1. FAPESP
  2. CNPq
  3. PRP/USP (Q-NANO)
  4. Natural Science Foundation of China [11004120]
  5. Capes [88887.065021/2014-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit (SO) couplings in GaAs quantum wells in the range of well widths w allowing for a transition of the electron occupancy from one to two subbands. By performing a detailed Poisson-Schrodinger self-consistent calculation, we determine all the intra-and intersubband Rashba (alpha(1), alpha(2), eta) and Dresselhaus (beta(1), beta(2), Gamma) coupling strengths. For relatively narrow wells with only one subband occupied, our results are consistent with the data of Koralek et al. [Nature (London) 458, 610 (2009)], i.e., the Rashba coupling alpha(1) is essentially independent of w in contrast to the decreasing linear Dresselhaus coefficient beta(1). When we widen the well so that the second subband can also be populated, we observe that alpha(2) decreases and alpha(1) increases, both almost linearly with w. Interestingly, we find that in the parameter range studied (i.e., very asymmetric wells), alpha(2) can attain zero and change its sign, while alpha(1) is always positive. In this double-occupancy regime of w's, beta(1) is mostly constant and beta(2) decreases with w (similarly to beta(1) for the single-occupancy regime). On the other hand, the intersubband Rashba coupling strength. decreases with w, while the intersubband Dresselhaus Gamma remains almost constant. We also determine the persistent-spin-helix symmetry points, at which the Rashba and the renormalized (due to cubic corrections) linear Dresselhaus couplings in each subband are equal, as a function of the well width and doping asymmetry. Our results should stimulate experiments probing SO couplings in multisubband wells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据