4.1 Article

Clinical characteristics of recessive and dominant congenital hyperinsulinism due to mutation(s) in the ABCC8/KCNJ11 genes encoding the ATP-sensitive potasium channel in the pancreatic beta cell

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 24, 期 11-12, 页码 1019-1023

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER & CO
DOI: 10.1515/JPEM.2011.347

关键词

congenital hyperinsulinism; K-ATP channel; mutation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Recessive mutations in ABCC8/KCNJ11 of beta-cell K-ATP channel generally cause severe medically unresponsive hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (HH). Rarer dominant mutations in these genes have been described that mostly cause milder, medically responsive congenital hyperinsulinism. Rarer dominant mutations in these genes have been described that mostly cause milder, medically responsive congenital hyperinsulinism. To date the phenotype of patients with dominant mutations seems to be different from those with recessive mutations as the majority of patients are responsive to diazoxide therapy. Controversy exists on whether these dominant ABCC8 or KCNJ11 genes mutations predispose to diabetes mellitus in adulthood or not. Subjects: We report the clinical and genetic characteristics of five patients with neonatal HH, three had recessively inherited K-ATP channel mutations and two with a dominantly acting mutation. As a result of failure to medical therapy, patients with recessive K-ATP channel mutations underwent a near total pancreatectomy. Two siblings with a novel dominant mutation showed good response to medical treatment. Although the HH remitted in early infancy, they became diabetic at the prepubertal age. Their mother, maternal aunt and maternal grandfather had the same mutation without any medical history of neonatal HH. Conclusion: The clinical presentation of our two patients with a dominant ABCC8 mutation was milder than that of patients with the resessive form of the disease as they responded well to medical management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据