4.7 Article

Distinct sites of renal fibrosis in Crim1 mutant mice arise from multiple cellular origins

期刊

JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 229, 期 5, 页码 685-696

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/path.4155

关键词

endothelialmesenchymal transition; endothelial cells; monocytes; glomerulus; renal fibrosis; renal inflammation; Crim1; Havcr1; Kim1; collagen type III

资金

  1. UQIRTA
  2. UQRS
  3. NHMRC [511032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crim1 is a transmembrane protein that regulates the bioavailability of growth factors such as VEGFA. Crim1KST264/KST264 hypomorphic mice develop renal disease characterized by glomerular cysts and loss of endothelial integrity, progressing to peritubular and pericystic fibrosis. Peritubular capillary endothelial cells display morphological changes as well as detachment from the basement membrane. In this study, gene expression profiling of CD31+ endothelial cells isolated from Crim1KST264/KST264 kidneys showed up-regulation of transcripts associated with fibrosis (Col3a1, Loxl1), endothelial dysfunction (Abp1, Dcn, Lcn2), biomarkers of renal damage (Lcn2, Havcr1/Kim1) as well as evidence for a TGF1/TNF-associated inflammatory process. To determine whether the aberrant endothelium may in part contribute to the fibrogenic process, Tie2Cre-DsRed lineage tracing was undertaken in Crim1KST264/KST264 mice. Approximately 31% of de novo SMA+ myofibroblasts detected within the tubulointerstitium were Tie2+DsRed+. However, 5.3% were F4/80+DsRed+, indicating a small population of myofibroblasts of monocytic rather than endothelial origin. In contrast, only 12% of myofibroblasts located around glomerular cysts were Tie2+DsRed+, with 7.7% being monocyte-derived (F4/80+DsRed+). Collectively, this model supports the involvement of endothelial cells/monocytes in fibrosis within the tubulointerstitium, but also the heterogeneity of the fibrotic process even within distinct regions of the same kidney. Copyright (c) 2012 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据