4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Micronutrient Supplementation in Adult Nutrition Therapy: Practical Considerations

期刊

JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 548-562

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1177/0148607108328470

关键词

micronutrients; trace elements; vitamins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Preexisting micronutrient (vitamins and trace elements) deficiencies are often present in hospitalized patients. Deficiencies Occur due to inadequate or inappropriate administration, increased or altered requirements, and increased losses, affecting various biochemical processes and resulting in organ dysfunction, poor wound healing, and altered immune status with deleterious sequelae. Guidelines for the 13 essential vitamins and 10 essential trace elements have been established. These recommendations, however, are applicable to healthy adults and not to critically ill patients, in whom decreased serum levels may indicate actual deficiencies or a deficiency due to redistribution. Benefits Of Supplementation over and above the daily requirements, which may not result in increased serum levels, are also unclear and may,, in fact, be detrimental. Vitamin requirements are increased in disease states, but a similar recommendation for trace elements has not been initiated except for selenium (Se) and zinc (Zn). In practice, a multivitamin preparation and a multiple trace element admixture (containing Zn, Se, copper, chromium, and manganese) are added to par enteral nutrition formulations. Most: enteral nutrition preparations also contain adequate amounts of vitamins and trace elements, although bioavailability may be an issue. Detailed information about individual micronutrient use specifically in hospitalized adult patients receiving nutrition therapy will be discussed, emphasizing the practical and clinical aspects. Clinicians are encouraged to think of micronutrients not as nutritional Supplements alone but also as therapeutic agents and nutraceuticals. (JPEN J Parenter Entered Man 2009;33: 548-562)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据