4.5 Article

Emergency Department Experiences of Acutely Symptomatic Patients With Terminal Illness and Their Family Caregivers

期刊

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 972-981

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.10.004

关键词

Emergency department; pain; patient; caregiver; palliative care; qualitative research

资金

  1. Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital
  2. institutional National Research Service [5 T32 HP11001-19]
  3. National Institute on Aging [R01AG028481]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG028481] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Despite increased focus on improving palliative care in the emergency department (ED), there is little research on how to best address the specific needs of this patient population. Objectives. To better understand the experiences of acutely symptomatic patients seen in the ED. Methods. Using in-person semi-structured interviews, we explored the attitudes, experiences, and beliefs of 14 patients and seven family caregivers on the inpatient palliative care consult service, who had been admitted through the ED at two academic medical centers. We used a grounded theory approach to code responses. Transcripts were coded by a palliative medicine physician, an emergency medicine physician, and a general internist. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Coded sections were iteratively reviewed for interpretation, and concepts were collapsed into themes. Results. Five distinct themes emerged: 1) unprepared for managing symptoms at home; 2) uncertainty and anxiety; 3) communication is essential; 4) mixed experiences with symptom management; and 5) conflicting perspectives about the purpose of palliative care clinicians in the ED. Conclusion. Patients and caregivers identified systems, communication, and clinical issues in ED care that should be a focus for future research. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010;39:972-981. (C) 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据