4.5 Article

Access to Services for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Invisibility of Breathlessness

期刊

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
卷 36, 期 5, 页码 451-460

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.11.008

关键词

Breathlessness; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; access to services; palliative care; invisibility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to explore the experience of breathlessness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) through patients' accounts of their interactions with services. The study has a qualitative design based on Grounded Theory. Data were collected through semistructured, in-depth interviews over the period of July 2005 to March 2006. This was complemented by participant observation during outpatient consultations. NVivo software was used to manage and anlayze the data. The study is part of a wider program, Improving Breathlessness. Data were collected in a large inner city teaching hospital and the community in London. A purposive sample of 18 COPD patients was selected. Fourteen patients were recruited from outpatient clinics in the hospital, four patients via a family doctor's surgery. Patients with moderate or severe COPD, who were experiencing problems with breathlessness, were included. The results showed that the low access to services by COPD patients is due to the nature of breathlessness itself, with its slow and surreptitious onset; patient interactions with the social environment assigning stigma to breathlessness; and the way the symptom is addressed by institutions, such as health care services, which discredit the patient's experience. The concept that best captures the experience of breathlessness is invisibility. Problems with access to care are an additional dimension of suffering added to the illness experience. A palliative care approach is promoted and essential priorities identified to reduce barriers to access. J Pain Sympton Manage 2008;36:451-460. (C) 2008 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据