4.3 Article

Treatment of Protrusio Fractures of the Acetabulum in Patients 70 Years and Older

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 256-261

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318269126f

关键词

acetabulum; protrusio; fracture; senior

资金

  1. University Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation (UOREF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To present clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes in patients 70 years and older with a protrusio-type acetabulum fracture. Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: Two level 1 trauma centers. Patients: Between November 2000 and December 2009, 39 consecutive patients older than 70 years with protrusio acetabulum fractures were enrolled. Intervention: Open reduction internal fixation using a combination of pelvic brim and infrapectineal plates. Main Outcome Measurements: Clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes as assessed with the modified Merle d'Aubigne score. Results: Twelve patients were lost to follow-up (<12 months), and one patient was excluded from analysis because he was treated with a percutaneous technique. The remaining 26 (67%) had a mean follow-up of 34 months (12-127 months). At the final follow-up, radiographic grades were excellent in 15, good in 3, poor in 3, and 5 patients had a total hip arthroplasty (19%) at an average of 18 months after the index procedure. The average modified Merle d'Aubigne score was 16 (9-18); categorized as excellent in 10, very good in 4, good in 7, fair in 2, and poor in 3. Conclusion: In the senior patient with a protrusio acetabulum fracture, a treatment strategy that optimizes preoperative conditions, minimizes operative time and blood loss, achieves a stable concentric hip joint, and encourages immediate postoperative ambulation can result in reasonable clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes with acceptable morbidity. This appears to remain true even in the face of a less than anatomic reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据