4.3 Article

Prevention of Atrophic Nonunion by the Systemic Administration of Parathyroid Hormone (PTH 1-34) in an Experimental Animal Model

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
卷 26, 期 12, 页码 719-723

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31826f5b9e

关键词

teriparatide; nonunion; animal; fracture healing

资金

  1. NYULMC IACUC [110609-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-34) has been previously shown to enhance fracture healing in animal models. Here, we sought to determine whether the systemic administration of PTH 1-34 is effective in preventing atrophic fracture nonunion in a murine, surgical nonunion model. Methods: We used an established reproducible long-bone murine fracture nonunion model by generating a midshaft femur fracture, followed by fracture distraction using an intramedullary pin and custom metallic clip to maintain a fracture gap of 1.7 mm. Mice were randomized to receive either daily intraperitoneal injections of 30 mg/kg PTH 1-34 for 14 days or saline injections. At 6 weeks after the procedure, radiographic and histologic assessment of fracture healing was performed. Results: At 6 weeks after surgery, the group treated with PTH showed higher rates of bony union (50% vs 8%; P < 0.05) as assessed by radiographic analysis. Mean gap size was also significantly lower in the PTH group (1.42 vs 0.36 mm in the control group; P < 0.05). Histologic analysis of atrophic nonunions in the control group revealed a persistent fracture gap with intervening fibrous tissue. In contrast, healed subjects in the PTH-treated group had cortical bridging with mature bone and relatively little callus, which is consistent with primary intramembranous ossification. Conclusions: Daily systemic administration of recombinant PTH 1-34 increased the rate of union in a mouse atrophic nonunion model. This may have important implications for the potential clinical role of PTH 1-34 in the treatment of atrophic fracture nonunions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据