4.3 Article

The Role of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Reticulated Open Cell Foam in the Treatment of War Wounds

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
卷 22, 期 10, 页码 S138-S141

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318188e27d

关键词

NPWT/ROCF; aeromedical; VAC; VAC Therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The treatment of war wounds poses many unique challenges to all healthcare providers (surgeons, flight medics, nurses, etc.), whether they arc located at the far forward trauma hospitals located in or near areas of conflict, at regional hospitals Such as Landstuhl Medical Center in Germany, or the larger military hospitals in the United States. These complex wounds often involve massive loss of soft tissue and bone, arc contaminated, and are unlike most injuries seen at civilian hospitals. Treatment guidelines, or doctrine, Lire the result of lessons learned in conflicts over the past few centuries dating back to early 19th century Europe through the Vietnam and recent Persian Gulf war. Advances in surgical and medical treatment have resulted from the complex challenges presented to the war trauma surgeon. More than I million patients have been treated for chronic pressure ulcers, abdominal wounds, diabetic ulcers. and acute civilian trauma wounds with negative pressure wound therapy with reticulated open cell foam (NPWT/ROCF) as delivered by VA.C.(R) Therapy (KCI, San Antonio. TX) for over the past decade. However, the use of NPWT/ROCF for the care of war Wounds at battlefield trauma hospitals and/or in the aeromedical evacuation transport system aboard aircraft is a new application of this wound treatment not yet accepted as doctrine. Investigational studies are ongoing to Study the safety and efficacy of the treatment of battlefield wounds with NPWT/ROCF both for those national citizens treated at the trauma hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan and for those Wounded American and coalition patients who are transported through the aeromedical transport system to medical centers in the United States.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据