4.7 Article

Fluorescence Properties of Simple N-Substituted Aldimines with a B-N Interaction and Their Fluorescence Quenching by a Cyanide Ion

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 74, 期 19, 页码 7496-7503

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jo901733b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Research Fellowship of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists
  4. Shorai Foundation for Science and Technology, Iketani Science and Technology Foundation
  5. Mistubishi Chemical Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-Aryl, A-alkyl, N-alkoxy, and N-amino derivatives of 2-[bis(pentafluorophenyl)boryl]benzylideneamine were synthesized by the condensation reactions of 2-[bis(pentanuorophenyl)boryl]benzaldehyde with the corresponding amines. Their structures were investigated by NMR and Xray crystallographic analysis. Their properties were investigated by UV-vis and fluorescence spectroscopy. The boryl-substituted N-arylimines show blue or green fluorescence in hexane at room temperature, and their fluorescence efficiency is Much higher than that of N-benzylideneaniline. In particular, the boryl-substituted N-(4-dimethylaiminophenyl)imine showed strong green emissions with at least 7000 times higher fluorescence quantum yield (0.73) compared with that of N-benzylideneaniline. The boryl-substituted N-(1-indolyl)- and N-(9-carbazolyl)imines showed dual emissions, one of which was assignable as arising from the lowest singlet excited state and the other from the local excited state of the substituent on the imine nitrogen. The fluorescent properties of the boryl-substituted N-butyl- and N-methoxyimines were also investigated. Reactions of the N-arylimine derivatives with cyanide ion gave the corresponding cyanide adducts and quenched the fluorescence, indicating that these 2-[bis(pentafluorophenyl)boryl]benzylideneamine derivatives have a potential as a cyanide ion sensor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据