4.1 Article

Resolution of Oral Bisphosphonate and Steroid-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw-A Serial Case Analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 68, 期 5, 页码 1055-1063

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.12.030

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To offer recommendations of risk factors, prevention, and treatment of oral bisphosphonate and steroid-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BSRONJ) in Taiwan. Materials and Methods: Twelve patients were clinicopathologically proved to have bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ). All of the patients were taking oral bisphosphonates and were concurrently administered long-term steroids. Of the 12 patients, 3 patients were assigned to the first stage of BRONJ; 5 patients were assigned to the second stage, and 4 patients were assigned to the third stage. The patients' symptoms, localization of necrosis, presence of a fistula, and association with possible triggering factors for onset of the lesion were recorded. Results: The radiologic investigations revealed osteolytic areas and scintigraphy demonstrated increased bone metabolism. Microbiologic analysis showed pathogenic actinomycosis organisms in a majority of patients (91.6%). Antibiotic therapy, minor debridement surgery, and combined hyperbaric oxygen therapy were useful in obtaining short-term symptomatic relief. Conclusions: Comorbidities of steroid use along with bisphosphonates may cause osteonecrosis of the jaw to occur sooner, be more severe, and respond more slowly to a drug discontinuation. The clinical disease of BSRONJ is more severe and more unpredictable to treat than BRONJ. From the data gained from other published studies of BRONJ and our clinical experience with the series of cases of BSRONJ we offer recommendations of risk factors, prevention, and treatment of BSRONJ in southern Taiwan. (C) 2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1055-1063, 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据