4.1 Article

Two- and 13-week Inhalation Toxicities of Indium-tin Oxide and Indium Oxide in Rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 51-63

出版社

JAPAN SOC OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
DOI: 10.1539/joh.L10128

关键词

Indium-tin oxide; Indium oxide; Inhalation; Pulmonary toxicity; Rat

资金

  1. JX Nippon Mining & Metals, Corp. (former Nippon Mining & Metals Co., Ltd.)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two- and 13-week Inhalation Toxicities of Indium-tin Oxide and Indium Oxide in Rats: Kasuke NAGANO, et al. Japan Bioassay Research Center, Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association Objectives: Two- and 13-week inhalation toxicities of indium-tin oxide (ITO) and indium oxide (IO) were characterized for risk assessments of workers exposed to ITO. Methods: F344 rats of both sexes were exposed by inhalation to ITO or IO aerosol for 6 h/day, 5 day/wk for 2 wk at 0, 0.1, 1, 10 or 100 mg/m(3) or 13 wk at 0, 0.1or 1 mg/m(3). An aerosol generator and inhalation exposure system was constructed. Results: Blood and lung contents of indium were elevated in a dose-related manner in the ITO- and IO-exposed rats. ITO and IO particles were deposited in the lung, mediastinal lymph node and nasal-associated lymphoid tissue. Exposures to ITO and IO induced alveolar proteinosis, infiltrations of alveolar macrophages and inflammatory cells and alveolar epithelial hyperplasia in addition to increased lung weight. ITO affected the lung more severely than IO did. Fibrosis of alveolar wall developed and some of these lesions worsened at the end of the 26-week post-exposure period. Conclusions: Persistent pulmonary lesions including alveolar proteinosis and macrophage infiltration occurred after 2- and 13-week inhalation exposures of rats to ITO and IO. Fibrosis of alveolar wall developed later. These lesions occurred after ITO exposure at the same concentration as the current occupational exposure limit in the USA and at blood indium levels below the biological exposure index in Japan for indium. (J Occup Health 2011; 53: 51-63)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据