4.6 Article

Shikimic acid ozonolysis kinetics of the transition from liquid aqueous solution to highly viscous glass

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 17, 期 46, 页码 31101-31109

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cp04544d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [130175]
  2. EU FP7 project PEGASOS
  3. Max Planck Graduate Center
  4. Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz (MPGC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ageing of particulate organic matter affects the composition and properties of atmospheric aerosol particles. Driven by temperature and humidity, the organic fraction can vary its physical state between liquid and amorphous solid, or rarely even crystalline. These transitions can influence the reaction kinetics due to limitations of mass transport in such (semi-) solid states, which in turn may influence the chemical ageing of particles containing such compounds. We have used coated wall flow tube experiments to investigate the reaction kinetics of the ozonolysis of shikimic acid, which serves as a proxy for oxygenated, water-soluble organic matter and can form a glass at room temperature. Particular attention was paid to how the presence of water influences the reaction, since it acts a plasticiser and thereby induces changes in the physical state. We analysed the results by means of a traditional resistor model, which assumes steady-state conditions. The ozonolysis rate of shikimic acid is strongly increased in the presence of water, a fact we attribute to the increased transport of O-3 and shikimic acid through the condensed phase at lower viscosities. The analysis using the resistor model suggests that the system undergoes both surface and bulk reaction. The second-order rate coefficient of the bulk reaction is 3.7 (+1.5/-3.2) x 10(3) L mol(-1) s(-1). At low humidity and long timescales, the resistor model fails to describe the measurements appropriately. The persistent O-3 uptake at very low humidity suggests contribution of a self-reaction of O-3 on the surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据