4.1 Article

Front-of-Package References to Fiber on Foods in Canadian Supermarkets Highlight the Need for Increased Nutrition Knowledge Among Consumers

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR
卷 45, 期 6, 页码 518-524

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.02.003

关键词

nutrition labeling; nutrition literacy; dietary fiber; nutrition-related marketing; front-of-package

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP -102655]
  2. Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Doctoral Research Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess the nature of the guidance on fiber, a nutrient for which many Canadians' intakes are suboptimal, provided by manufacturers' use of front-of-package references on food in Canadian supermarkets. Design/Setting: Survey of all prepackaged food sold in 3 large supermarkets in Toronto. Variables Measured: Front-of-package references to fiber and other forms of nutrition-related marketing were recorded from all products. For a subsample of breads, Nutrition Facts table information was also collected. Analysis: Descriptive statistics; t test. Results: Front-of-package references to fiber were found on 6% of all foods, but large proportions of high fiber foods bore no front-of-package references to fiber. Many foods making a reference to fiber (17%) are foods to limit, according to Canada's Food Guide. Front-of-package references to fiber were declared in at least 30 different ways, and 31% used unregulated language. Among breads, use of regulated language was associated with higher fiber content. Conclusions and Implications: Consumers may be faced with challenges in seeking out healthful sources of fiber in the grocery store, given the complexity of existing front-of-package nutrition-related marketing and limited references to fiber in some categories. This work suggests that current nutritionrelated marketing cannot function as a substitute for nutrition education.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据