4.6 Article

Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Can Be Used to Assess Vitamin A Metabolism Quantitatively in Boys in a Community Setting

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 140, 期 9, 页码 1588-1594

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/jn.110.125500

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States Agency for International Development/CDC
  2. Bristol Myers Squibb
  3. NIH/NCRR [13461]
  4. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A survey indicated that high-dose vitamin A (HD-VA) supplements had no apparent effect on vitamin A (VA) status, assessed by serum retinol concentrations, of Zambian children < 5 y of age. To explore possible reasons for the lack of response, we quantified absorption, retention, and urinary elimination of either a single HD-VA supplement (209.8 mu mol; 60 mg) or a smaller dose of stable isotope (SI)-labeled VA (17.5 mu mol; 5 mg), which was used to estimate VA pool size, in 3- to 4-y-old Zambian boys In = 4 for each VA dose). A tracer dose of [C-14(2)]-labeled VA (0.925 kBq; 25 nCi) was coadministered with the HD-VA supplement or SI-labeled VA, and 24-h stool and urine samples were collected for 3 and 7 consecutive days, respectively, and 24-h urine samples at 4 later time points. Accelerator MS was used to quantify C-14 in stool and urine. Estimates of absorption, retention, and the urinary elimination rate (UER) were 83.8 +/- 7.1%, 76.3 +/- 6.7%, and 1.9 +/- 0.6%/d, respectively, for the HD-VA supplement and 76.5 +/- 9.5%, 71.1 +/- 9.4%, and 1.8 +/- 1.2%/d, respectively, for the SI-labeled VA. Mean estimates of absorption, retention, and the UER did not differ by size of the VA dose administered. Estimated absorption and retention were negatively associated with reported fever (r = -0.83; P = 0.011). The HD-VA supplement and SI-labeled VA were adequately absorbed, retained, and utilized in apparently healthy Zambian preschool-age boys; absorption and retention may be affected by recent fever. J. Nutr. 140: 1588-1594, 2010.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据