4.6 Article

Provision of Multiple Rather Than Two or Fewer Micronutrients More Effectively Improves Growth and Other Outcomes in Micronutrient-Deficient Children and Adults

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 139, 期 5, 页码 1022-1030

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/jn.107.086199

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
  2. Academy for Educational Development [GHS-A-00-05-00012-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deficiencies of multiple micronutrients (MMN) usually coexist in developing countries, but supplements have usually provided only 1 or 2 micronutrients (MN). To inform policy, in this article we compared the relative benefits of supplying MMN vs. a placebo or 1 or 2 MN on the following: children's growth, health, and development; pregnancy outcome; nutritional status; and HIV/AIDS mortality and morbidity in adults. Sufficient data were available to perform random-effects meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCT) for the effects of MMN on child growth and nutritional status. Results for other outcomes are presented as effect sizes (ES) when available. In children, MMN interventions resulted in small but significantly greater improvements in length or height (ES = 0.13; 95% Cl: 0.055, 0.21) and weight (ES = 0.14; 95% Cl: 0.029, 0.25), hemoglobin (ES = 0.39; 95% Cl: 0.25, 0.53), serum zinc (ES = 0.23; 95% Cl: 0.18, 0.43), serum retinol (ES = 0.33;95% Cl:0.050, 0.61), and motor development. A Cochrane review reported that compared with no supplementation or a placebo, MMN supplementation during pregnancy reduced the relative risk of low birth weight (0.83), small-for-gestational age (0.92), and anemia (0.61); however, MMN were not more effective than iron + folic acid alone. There is some evidence that MMN supplementation improves CD4 counts and HIV-related morbidity and mortality in adults. The efficacy of MMN varies across trials, but overall there is evidence that outcomes are better than when providing <= 2 MN. The policy implications of these studies are discussed. J. Nutr. 139: 1022-1030, 2009.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据