4.6 Article

Chelerythrine-lysozyme interaction: spectroscopic studies, thermodynamics and molecular modeling exploration

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 17, 期 25, 页码 16630-16645

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cp00424a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) [BSC0123]
  2. University Grants Commission (UGC), Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The binding of the iminium and alkanolamine forms of chelerythrine to lysozyme (Lyz) was investigated by spectroscopy and docking studies. The thermodynamics of the binding was studied by calorimetry. Spectroscopic evidence suggested that Trp-62 and Trp-63 in the beta-domain of the protein are closer to the binding site; moreover, the binding site was at a distance of 2.27 and 2.00 nm from the iminium and alkanolamine forms, respectively, according to the Forster theory of non-radiation energy transfer. The equilibrium binding constants for the iminium and alkanolamine forms at 298 K were evaluated to be 1.29 x 10(5) and 7.79 x 10(5) M-1, respectively. The binding resulted in an alteration of the secondary structure of the protein with a distinct reduction of the helical organization. The binding of iminium was endothermic, involving electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions, while that of alkanolamine form was exothermic and dominated by hydrogen bonding interactions. Docking studies provided the atomistic details pertaining to the binding of both forms of chelerythrine and supported the higher binding in favour of the alkanolamine over the iminium. Furthermore, molecular dynamics study provided accurate insights regarding the binding of both chelerythrine forms in accordance with the experimental results obtained. Chelerythrine binding pocket involves the catalytic region and aggregation prone K-peptide region, which are sandwiched between one another. Overall, these results suggest that both the forms of the alkaloid bind to the protein but the neutral form has higher affinity than the cationic form.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据