4.7 Article

The two-step scenario of the protein dynamical transition

期刊

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
卷 357, 期 2, 页码 622-628

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.08.002

关键词

Hydration water; Protein dynamical transition; Fragile-strong cross-over; Myoglobin; Neutron scattering

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 533]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The protein dynamical transition (PDT) characterizes the abrupt loss of structural flexibility at a particular temperature and time scale in response to the glass transition of protein hydration water. The water-coupled structural degrees of freedom interact with the protein via hydrogen bonds, causing fluctuations, which can be probed by dynamic neutron scattering experiments. To emphasize the properties of hydration water a perdeuterated protein C-PC hydrated with H2O is investigated together with native myoglobin. The respective intermediate scattering function of hydration water displays a two-step decay involving fast local re-orientational fluctuations and a slow collective relaxation. The anharmonic onset in the mean squared displacements, which is generally used to identify the PDT, is derived from the properties of the intermediate scattering function at the time given by the resolution of the spectrometer. It is shown that the onset temperature depends on the shape of the relaxation time spectrum. A shape-independent transition temperature TA is defined, associated with the main structural relaxation, which decreases with increasing resolution. A second onset is identified near the glass temperature T-g, which is related to the initial decay of the intermediate scattering function. This onset is independent of the instrumental resolution and causes a change in molecular elasticity and thermal expansion. With this approach a more precise definition of the PDT is given, providing answers to the critical questions about the nature and the mechanism of the effect. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据