4.6 Article

Long-term natural history of incidentally discovered cavernous malformations in a single-center cohort

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
卷 120, 期 5, 页码 1188-1192

出版社

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.JNS131619

关键词

cavernous malformation; cavernous angioma; incidental; natural history; asymptomatic; vascular disorders

资金

  1. Mayo Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Object. The aim of this study was to determine the prospective hemorrhage rate in a group of retrospectively identified patients in whom symptoms had an unclear relationship to an intracerebral cavernous malformation (ICM) or the malformation itself was an incidental finding. Methods. Patients with incidentally discovered ICMs diagnosed between 1989 and 1999 were identified from a previously published cohort. Those with ICMs having an unclear relationship with existing symptoms were also eligible for analysis. Updated clinical and radiographic data pertaining to symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage related to the ICM or new seizures were obtained through medical chart review and mail survey. In select patients, phone calls were made and death certificates were obtained when possible. The prospective hemorrhage rate was calculated as the number of prospective hemorrhages divided by the number of patient-years of follow-up. Results. There were 1311 patient-years of follow-up among the 107 patients (49.5% male; mean age at diagnosis 52 years) eligible for this study. Forty-four patients died in the follow-up period, and the cause of death could be determined in 34 (77%). Two patients had a prospective hemorrhage, which was definitively related to the ICM in only one. Thus, the definitive prospective bleed rate was 0.08% per patient-year. No new seizures developed in any of the patients during the follow-up period. Conclusions. The risk of prospective hemorrhage in patients presenting asymptomatically With ICM is very low. This information can be useful in managing such patients and may be most applicable to those with a single ICM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据