4.5 Article

Estrogen receptor- ligand treatment after disease onset is neuroprotective in the multiple sclerosis model

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 91, 期 7, 页码 901-908

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.23219

关键词

EAE; estrogen; multiple sclerosis; neuroprotection; myelin

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute through the Precollege and Undergraduate Science Education Program
  2. NIH Neuroendocrinology, Sex Differences, and Reproduction (LNE) training grant [5T32HD07228]
  3. National Institutes of Health [K24 NS062117]
  4. National Multiple Society [RG4362, RG4033]
  5. Conrad Hilton Foundation
  6. Jack Skirball Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation and neurodegeneration. Current MS treatments were designed to reduce inflammation in MS rather than directly to prevent neurodegeneration. Estrogen has well-documented neuroprotective effects in a variety of disorders of the CNS, including experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), the most widely used mouse model of MS. Treatment with an estrogen receptor- (ER) ligand is known to ameliorate clinical disease effectively and provide neuroprotection in EAE. However, the protective effects of this ER ligand have been demonstrated only when administered prior to disease (prophylactically). Here we tested whether ER ligand treatment could provide clinical protection when treatment was initiated after onset of disease (therapeutically). We found that therapeutic treatment effectively ameliorated clinical disease in EAE. Specifically, ER ligand-treated animals exhibited preserved axons and myelin compared with vehicle-treated animals. We observed no difference in the number of T lymphocytes, macrophages, or microglia in the CNS of vehicle- vs. ER ligand-treated animals. Our findings show that therapeutically administered ER ligand successfully treats clinical EAE, bearing translational relevance to MS as a candidate neuroprotective agent. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据