4.5 Article

Pituitary Adenylyl Cyclase-Activating Peptide Counteracts Hedgehog-Dependent Motor Neuron Production in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Cultures

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 89, 期 9, 页码 1363-1374

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.22675

关键词

embryonic stem cells; motor neuron; mouse; neuropeptide; PACAP; spinal cord

资金

  1. NIH [HD06576, HD34475, HD04612]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pituitary adenylyl cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP; ADCYAP1) is a neuropeptide that regulates a wide array of functions within the brain and periphery. We and others have previously demonstrated that PACAP and its high-affinity receptor PAC1 are expressed in the embryonic mouse neural tube, suggesting that PACAP plays a role in early brain development. Moreover, we previously showed that PACAP antagonizes the mitotic action of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) in postnatal cerebellar granule precursors. In the present study, we demonstrate that PACAP completely blocked Shh-dependent motor neuron generation from embryonic stem cell cultures and reduced mRNA levels of the Shh target gene Gli-1 and several ventral spinal cord patterning genes. In vivo examination of motor neuron and other patterning markers in embryonic day 12.5 spinal cords of wild-type and PACAP-deficient mice by immunofluorescence, on the other hand, revealed no obvious alterations in expressions of Islet1/2, MNR2, Lim1/2, Nkx2.2, or Shh, although the Pax6-positive area was slightly expanded in PACAP-deficient spinal cord. Caspase-3 staining revealed low, and similar, numbers of cells undergoing apoptosis in embryonic wild-type vs. PACAP-deficient spinal cords, whereas a slight but significant increase in number of mitotic cells was observed in PACAP-deficient mice. Thus, although PACAP has a strong capacity to counteract Shh signaling and motor neuron production in vitro, corresponding patterning defects associated with PACAP loss may be obscured by compensatory mechanisms. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据