4.5 Article

High Potassium Induces Taurine Release by Osmosensitive and Osmoresistant Mechanisms in the Rat Hippocampus In Vivo

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 87, 期 1, 页码 208-217

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.21818

关键词

glutamate; glutamine; hypoosmotic swelling; NMDA receptors; microdialysis

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias [P1030615]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high potassium-evoked taurine efflux in the nervous tissue has been entirely considered to be the result of the cell swelling produced by KCl influx via passive Donnan forces. However, the extracellular taurine increase evoked in the hippocampus by applying 6-100 mM KCl through microdialysis probes, which saturates at a concentration of 25 mM KCl, is not congruent with the mentioned osmosensitive release of taurine stimulated by high potassium. Therefore, we studied whether the taurine release elicited by different high KCl concentrations (25, 50, 75, or 100 mM) was blocked under hypertonic conditions (+100 mM sucrose). Taurine release stimulated by 25 mM KCl was totally osmosensitive, but that released by higher KCI concentrations became progressively osmoresistant, achieving more than the 60% of the extracellular taurine enhancement during 100 mM KCI perfusion. The osmoresistant taurine release evoked by 100 mM KCI perfusion was partially reduced by a solution without Ca2+ and with high Mg2+, or by D,L-2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acid, an N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist. Moreover, the release of taurine induced by a hypoosmotic solution was reduced by the presence of either high K+ (75 mM) or NMDA (100 mu M). These results indicate that although moderately high [K+] evoke the osmosensitive release of taurine, higher [K+] inhibit it and trigger the release of taurine by an osmoresistant mechanism. This last component is partially mediated by NMDA receptors activated by the glutamate released during potassium-induced depolarization. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据