4.4 Article

Detection of input sites in scanning photostimulation data based on spatial correlations

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 192, 期 2, 页码 286-295

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.08.006

关键词

Laser scanning photostimulation; Optical uncaging; Functional anatomy; Entorhinal cortex

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (Bernstein Centers for Computational Neuroscience Berlin and Munich, Bernstein Fokus Neuronal Basis of Learning) [01GQ0410, 01GQ0440, 01GQ0981]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scanning photostimulation is a well-established method for studying the functional microcircuitry in brain slices. Light-evoked responses are thereby taken as an indicator for a connected presynaptic partner. Such an approach thus requires a clear distinction between the photo-evoked and the spontaneous responses. Here we show that, for a data set from entorhinal cortex layer II with high spontaneous synaptic rates of up to 10 Hz, it is possible to identify presynaptic sites. The underlying detection algorithm is based on the finding that a presynaptic cell has several neighboring activation sites, resulting in the clustered appearance of specific photo-evoked inputs. The main idea behind this approach is to identify hit locations at which the number of intracellularly recorded synaptic events is significantly larger as expected from the hypothesis of statistical independence. The algorithm works without making use of EPSC amplitude information and for single trials, i.e., each site is stimulated only once. The hit maps are tested upon reliability by repeated stimulations and by blocking synaptically mediated responses via TTX. Furthermore, based on the hit density of surrogate data, we devise a Bayesian formalism to estimate the number of presynaptic partners. In these simulations we find good agreement between estimated and real number of input cells, which shows that the hit density can be used as a reliable measure for afferent connectivity. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据