4.4 Article

Striatal volume differences between non-human and human primates

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 176, 期 2, 页码 200-205

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.08.027

关键词

MRI; Parkinson's disease; Convection-enhanced delivery; Putamen volume; Non-human primates

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [U54 NS045309, R01 NS050156-03, R01 NS050156, U54NS045309, U54 NS045309-010002] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has recently entered the clinic and represents a promising new delivery option for targeted gene therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD). The prime stereotactic target for the majority of recent gene therapy clinical trials has been the human putamen. The stereotactic delivery of therapeutic agents into putamen (or other subcortical structures) via CED remains problematic due to the difficulty in knowing what volume of therapeutic agent to deliver. Preclinical studies in non-human primates (NHP) offer a way to model treatment strategies prior to clinical trials. Understanding more accurately the volumetric differences in striatum, especially putamen, between NHP and humans is essential in predicting convective volume parameters in human clinical trials. In this study, magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained for volumetric measurements of striatum (putamen and caudate nucleus) and whole brain from 11 PD patients, 13 aged healthy human subjects, as well as 8 parkinsonian and 30 normal NHP. The human brain is 13-18 times larger than the monkey brain. However, this ratio is significantly smaller for striatum (5.7-6.5), caudate nucleus (4.6-6.6) and putamen (4.4-6.6). Size and species of the monkeys used for this comparative study are responsible for differences in ratios for each structure between monkeys and humans. This volumetric ratio may have important implications in the design of clinical therapies for PD and Huntington's disease and should be considered when local therapies such as gene transfer, local protein administration or cellular replacement are translated based on NHP research. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据