4.7 Article

Impaired Path Integration and Grid Cell Spatial Periodicity in Mice Lacking GluA1-Containing AMPA Receptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 34, 期 18, 页码 6245-6259

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4330-13.2014

关键词

entorhinal cortex; glutamate receptors; grid cells; hippocampus; navigation; path integration

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01GQ1003A]
  2. European Research Council [250047]
  3. Humboldt Research Fellowship
  4. CellNet-works Fellowship
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [250047] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hippocampus and the parahippocampal region have been proposed to contribute to path integration. Mice lacking GluA1-containing AMPA receptors (GluA1(-/-) mice) were previously shown to exhibit impaired hippocampal place cell selectivity. Here we investigated whether path integration performance and the activity of grid cells of the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) are affected in these mice. We first tested GluA1(-/-) mice on a standard food-carrying homing task and found that they were impaired in processing idiothetic cues. To corroborate these findings, we developed an L-maze task that is less complex and is performed entirely in darkness, thereby reducing numerous confounding variables when testing path integration. Also in this task, the performance of GluA1(-/-) mice was impaired. Next, we performed in vivo recordings in the MEC of GluA1(-/-) mice. MEC neurons exhibited altered grid cell spatial periodicity and reduced spatial selectivity, whereas head direction tuning and speed modulation were not affected. The firing associations between pairs of neurons in GluA1(-/-) mice were stable, both in time and space, indicating that attractor states were still present despite the lack of grid periodicity. Together, these results support the hypothesis that spatial representations in the hippocampal-entorhinal network contribute to path integration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据