4.7 Article

Fast But Fleeting: Adaptive Motor Learning Processes Associated with Aging and Cognitive Decline

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 34, 期 40, 页码 13411-13421

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1489-14.2014

关键词

aging; explicit memory; human; motor control; motor learning; state-space model

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. Human Frontiers Science Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motor learning has been shown to depend on multiple interacting learning processes. For example, learning to adapt when moving grasped objects with novel dynamics involves a fast process that adapts and decays quickly-and that has been linked to explicit memory-and a slower process that adapts and decays more gradually. Each process is characterized by a learning rate that controls how strongly motor memory is updated based on experienced errors and a retention factor determining the movement-to-movement decay in motor memory. Here we examined whether fast and slow motor learning processes involved in learning novel dynamics differ between younger and older adults. In addition, we investigated how age-related decline in explicit memory performance influences learning and retention parameters. Although the groups adapted equally well, they did so with markedly different underlying processes. Whereas the groups had similar fast processes, they had different slow processes. Specifically, the older adults exhibited decreased retention in their slow process compared with younger adults. Within the older group, who exhibited considerable variation in explicit memory performance, we found that poor explicit memory was associated with reduced retention in the fast process, as well as the slow process. These findings suggest that explicit memory resources are a determining factor in impairments in the both the fast and slow processes for motor learning but that aging effects on the slow process are independent of explicit memory declines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据