4.7 Article

Rapid Feedback Responses Correlate with Reach Adaptation and Properties of Novel Upper Limb Loads

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 33, 期 40, 页码 15903-15914

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0263-13.2013

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation (MRI)
  3. NSERC
  4. GSK-CIHR chair in Neuroscience

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hallmark of voluntary motor control is the ability to adjust motor patterns for novel mechanical or visuomotor contexts. Recent work has also highlighted the importance of feedback for voluntary control, leading to the hypothesis that feedback responses should adapt when we learn new motor skills. We tested this prediction with a novel paradigm requiring that human subjects adapt to a viscous elbow load while reaching to three targets. Target 1 required combined shoulder and elbow motion, target 2 required only elbow motion, and target 3 (probe target) required shoulder but no elbow motion. This simple approach controlled muscle activity at the probe target before, during, and after the application of novel elbow loads. Our paradigm allowed us to perturb the elbow during reaching movements to the probe target and identify several key properties of adapted stretch responses. Adapted long-latency responses expressed (de-)adaptation similar to reaching errors observed when we introduced (removed) the elbow load. Moreover, reaching errors during learning correlated with changes in the long-latency response, showing subjects who adapted more to the elbow load displayed greater modulation of their stretch responses. These adapted responses were sensitive to the sizeand direction of the viscous training load. Our results highlight an important link between the adaptation of feedforward and feedback control and suggest a key part of motor adaptation is to adjust feedback responses to the requirements of novel motor skills.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据