4.7 Article

Signals for Previous Goal Choice Persist in the Dorsomedial, but Not Dorsolateral Striatum of Rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 52-63

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2422-12.2013

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation grant [2011-0015618]
  2. Original Technology Research Program for Brain Science [2011-0019209]
  3. Brain Research Center of the 21st Century Frontier Research Program
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0015618] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cortico-basal ganglia network has been proposed to consist of parallel loops serving distinct functions. However, it is still uncertain how the content of processed information varies across different loops and how it is related to the functions of each loop. We investigated this issue by comparing neuronal activity in the dorsolateral (sensorimotor) and dorsomedial (associative) striatum, which have been linked to habitual and goal-directed action selection, respectively, in rats performing a dynamic foraging task. Both regions conveyed significant neural signals for the animal's goal choice and its outcome. Moreover, both regions conveyed similar levels of neural signals for action value before the animal's goal choice and chosen value after the outcome of the animal's choice was revealed. However, a striking difference was found in the persistence of neural signals for the animal's chosen action. Signals for the animal's goal choice persisted in the dorsomedial striatum until the outcome of the animal's next goal choice was revealed, whereas they dissipated rapidly in the dorsolateral striatum. These persistent choice signals might be used for causally linking temporally discontiguous responses and their outcomes in the dorsomedial striatum, thereby contributing to its role in goal-directed action selection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据