4.7 Article

Joint Representation of Depth from Motion Parallax and Binocular Disparity Cues in Macaque Area MT

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 33, 期 35, 页码 14061-U677

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0251-13.2013

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Eye Institute [EY013644, EY019087, EY001319]
  2. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY013644, P30EY001319, R01EY019087] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perception of depth is based on a variety of cues, with binocular disparity and motion parallax generally providing more precise depth information than pictorial cues. Much is known about how neurons in visual cortex represent depth from binocular disparity or motion parallax, but little is known about the joint neural representation of these depth cues. We recently described neurons in the middle temporal (MT) area that signal depth sign (near vs far) from motion parallax; here, we examine whether and how these neurons also signal depth from binocular disparity. We find that most MT neurons in rhesus monkeys (Macaca Mulatta) are selective for depth sign based on both disparity and motion parallax cues. However, the depth-sign preferences (near or far) are not always aligned: 56% of MT neurons have matched depth-sign preferences (congruent cells) whereas the remaining 44% of neurons prefer near depth from motion parallax and far depth from disparity, or vice versa (opposite cells). For congruent cells, depth-sign selectivity increases when disparity cues are added to motion parallax, but this enhancement does not occur for opposite cells. This suggests that congruent cells might contribute to perceptual integration of depth cues. We also found that neurons are clustered in MT according to their depth tuning based on motion parallax, similar to the known clustering of MT neurons for binocular disparity. Together, these findings suggest that area MT is involved in constructing a representation of 3D scene structure that takes advantage of multiple depth cues available to mobile observers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据