4.7 Article

Differences in Neural Activation for Object-Directed Grasping in Chimpanzees and Humans

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 33, 期 35, 页码 14117-14134

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2172-13.2013

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RR-00165, OD P51OD11132, MH58922, F31MH086179-01, 5P01 AG026423-03, RO1 MH068791]
  2. Wenner-Gren Foundation [3681]
  3. Emory Center for Systems Imaging [PET.HRRT.PS.001.12, MRI.3T.PS.001.12]
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P51RR000165] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH068791, P50MH058922, F31MH086179] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P01AG026423] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH [P51OD011132] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human faculty for object-mediated action, including tool use and imitation, exceeds that of even our closest primate relatives and is a key foundation of human cognitive and cultural uniqueness. In humans and macaques, observing object-directed grasping actions activates a network of frontal, parietal, and occipitotemporal brain regions, but differences in human and macaque activation suggest that this system has been a focus of selection in the primate lineage. To study the evolution of this system, we performed functional neuroimaging in humans' closest living relatives, chimpanzees. We compare activations during performance of an object-directed manual grasping action, observation of the same action, and observation of a mimed version of the action that consisted of only movements without results. Performance and observation of the same action activated a distributed frontoparietal network similar to that reported in macaques and humans. Like humans and unlike macaques, these regions were also activated by observing movements without results. However, in a direct chimpanzee/human comparison, we also identified unique aspects of human neural responses to observed grasping. Chimpanzee activation showed a prefrontal bias, including significantly more activity in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas human activation was more evenly distributed across more posterior regions, including significantly more activation in ventral premotor cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and inferotemporal cortex. This indicates a more bottom-up representation of observed action in the human brain and suggests that the evolution of tool use, social learning, and cumulative culture may have involved modifications of frontoparietal interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据