4.7 Article

Symmetrical Serotonin Release during Asymmetrical Slow-Wave Sleep: Implications for the Neurochemistry of Sleep-Waking States

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 2555-2561

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2603-12.2013

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-NS069640]
  2. National Science Foundation [0919929]
  3. Medical Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs
  4. Utrish Dolphinarium
  5. National Science and Engineering Council of Canada
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  7. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [0919929] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

On land, fur seals predominately display bilaterally synchronized electroencephalogram (EEG) activity during slow-wave sleep (SWS), similar to that observed in all terrestrial mammals. In water, however, fur seals exhibit asymmetric slow-wave sleep (ASWS), resembling the unihemispheric slow-wave sleep of odontocetes (toothed whales). The unique sleeping pattern of fur seals allows us to distinguish neuronal mechanisms mediating EEG changes from those mediating behavioral quiescence. In a prior study we found that cortical acetylcholine release is lateralized during ASWS in the northern fur seal, with greater release in the hemisphere displaying low-voltage (waking) EEG activity, linking acetylcholine release to hemispheric EEG activation (Lapierre et al. 2007). In contrast to acetylcholine, we now report that cortical serotonin release is not lateralized during ASWS. Our data demonstrate that bilaterally symmetric levels of serotonin are compatible with interhemispheric EEG asymmetry in the fur seal. We also find greatly elevated levels during eating and hosing the animals with water, suggesting that serotonin is more closely linked to bilateral variables, such as axial motor and autonomic control, than to the lateralized cortical activation manifested in asymmetrical sleep.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据