4.7 Article

Expectations Change the Signatures and Timing of Electrophysiological Correlates of Perceptual Awareness

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 1386-1396

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4570-10.2011

关键词

-

资金

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. Dr. Paul and Cilli Weill Foundation
  3. August Scheidel Foundation
  4. German Ministry of Education and Research
  5. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico [1070846]
  6. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica/Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous experience allows the brain to predict what comes next. How these expectations affect conscious experience is poorly understood. In particular, it is unknown whether and when expectations interact with sensory evidence in granting access to conscious perception, and how this is reflected electrophysiologically. Here, we parametrically manipulate sensory evidence and expectations while measuring event-related potentials in human subjects to assess the time course of evoked responses that correlate with subjective visibility, the properties of the stimuli, and/or perceptual expectations. We found that expectations lower the threshold of conscious perception and reduce the latency of neuronal signatures differentiating seen and unseen stimuli. Without expectations, this differentiation occurs similar to 300 ms and with expectations similar to 200 ms after stimulus in occipitoparietal sensors. The amplitude of this differentiating response component (P2) decreases as visibility increases, regardless of whether this increase is attributable to enhanced sensory evidence and/or the gradual buildup of perceptual expectations. Importantly, at matched performance levels, responses to seen and unseen stimuli differed regardless of the physical stimulus properties. These findings indicate that the latency of the neuronal correlates of access to consciousness depend on whether access is driven by stimulus saliency or by a combination of expectations and sensory evidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据