4.7 Article

Netrin Participates in the Development of Retinotectal Synaptic Connectivity by Modulating Axon Arborization and Synapse Formation in the Developing Brain

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 29, 期 36, 页码 11065-11077

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0947-09.2009

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Eye Institute [EY011912]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Netrin has been implicated in retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axon pathfinding in a number of species. In Xenopus laevis, RGC axons reaching their target in the optic tectum can be repelled by a netrin-1 gradient in vitro, suggesting that netrin may also function in wiring events that follow successful axon pathfinding. Here, we examined the contribution of netrin to RGC axon arborization and synapse formation at the target. Time-lapse confocal microscopy imaging of individual RGC axons coexpressing GFP-synaptobrevin and DsRed in the intact Xenopus brain demonstrated a role for deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC)-mediated netrin signaling. Microinjection of netrin-1 into the tectum induced a rapid and transient increase in presynaptic site addition that resulted in higher presynaptic site density over a 24 h observation period. Moreover, netrin induced dynamic axon branching, increasing branch addition and retraction; a behavior that ultimately increased total branch number. In contrast, microinjection of DCC function-blocking antibodies prevented the increase in presynaptic site number normally observed in control axons as well as the associated increase in branch number and axon arbor growth. Dynamic analysis of axon arbors demonstrated that the effects of anti-DCC on axon morphology and presynaptic connectivity were attributable to a specific decrease in new synapse and branch additions, without affecting the stability of existing synapses and branches. Together, these results indicate that, in the absence of DCC signaling, RGC axons fail to branch and differentiate, and support a novel role for netrin in later phases of retinotectal development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据