4.7 Article

Oxytocin-induced postinhibitory rebound firing facilitates bursting activity in oxytocin neurons

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 385-394

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5198-07.2008

关键词

hypothalamus; supraoptic; GABA; calcium current; neuroendocrine; lactation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During parturition and lactation, neurosecretory oxytocin (OT) neurons in the hypothalamus achieve pulsatile hormone secretion by coordinated bursts of firing that occur throughout the neuronal population. This activity is partly controlled by somatodendritic release of OT, which facilitates the onset and recurrence of synchronized bursting. To further investigate the cellular mechanisms underlying the control exerted by OT on the activity of its own neurons, we studied the effects of the peptide on membrane potential and synaptic activity in OT neurons in hypothalamic organotypic slice cultures. Bath application of low concentrations of OT (< 100 nM) facilitated GABA(A) receptor-mediated inhibitory transmission through a presynaptic mechanism without affecting membrane potential and excitatory glutamatergic synaptic activity. The facilitatory action of OT on GABAergic transmission was dose-dependent, starting at 25 nM and disappearing at concentrations > 100 nM. As shown previously, higher concentrations ofOT(> 500 nM) had the opposite effect, inhibiting GABAA receptors via a postsynaptic mechanism. Surprisingly, OT-mediated facilitation of GABAergic transmission promoted action potential firing in 40% of the neurons. Each action potential occurred at the end of the repolarizing phase of an inhibitory potential. Pharmacological dissection revealed that this firing involved the activation of low-threshold activated calcium channels. Detailed statistical analysis showed that OT-mediated firing upregulated bursting activity in OT neurons. It is thus likely to optimize OT secretion and, as a consequence, facilitate delivery and milk ejection in mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据