4.4 Article

Short- and long-term plasticity in CA1 neurons from mice lacking h-channel auxiliary subunit TRIP8b

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 110, 期 10, 页码 2350-2357

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00218.2013

关键词

hippocampus; I h; intrinsic plasticity; Schaffer collateral; perforant path

资金

  1. Epilepsy Foundation of America
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 NS-59934, R01 MH-048432]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated nonselective cation channels (HCN or h-channels) are important regulators of neuronal physiology contributing to passive membrane properties, such as resting membrane potential and input resistance (R-N), and to intrinsic oscillatory activity and synaptic integration. The correct membrane targeting of h-channels is regulated in part by the auxiliary h-channel protein TRIP8b. The genetic deletion of TRIP8b results in a loss of functional h-channels, which affects the postsynaptic integrative properties of neurons. We investigated the impact of TRIP8b deletion on long-term potentiation (LTP) at the two major excitatory inputs to CA1 pyramidal neurons: Schaffer collateral (SC) and perforant path (PP). We found that SC LTP was not significantly different between neurons from wild-type and TRIP8b-knockout mice. There was, however, significantly more short-term potentiation in knockout neurons. We also found that the persistent increase in h-current (I-h) that normally occurs after LTP induction was absent in knockout neurons. The lack of I-h plasticity was not restricted to activity-dependent induction, because the depletion of intracellular calcium stores also failed to produce the expected increase in I-h. Interestingly, pairing of SC and PP inputs resulted in a form of LTP in knockout neurons that did not occur in wild-type neurons. These results suggest that the physiological impact of TRIP8b deletion is not restricted to the integrative properties of neurons but also includes both synaptic and intrinsic plasticity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据