4.3 Article

Loss of Perivascular Kir4.1 Potassium Channels in the Sclerotic Hippocampus of Patients With Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e318267b5af

关键词

Astrocytes; Aquaporin; Dystroglycan; Dystrophin; Hippocampal sclerosis; KCNJ10; Syntrophin; Glia

资金

  1. Norwegian Association of Neurologists
  2. Norwegian Chapter of the International League against Epilepsy
  3. Research Council of Norway
  4. Letten Foundation
  5. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [NS058674, NS070824]
  6. Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the NIH [UL1 RR024139]
  7. NIH roadmap for Medical Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent experimental data in mice have shown that the inwardly rectifying K+ channel Kir4.1 mediates K+ spatial buffering in the hippocampus. Here we used immunohistochemistry to examine the distribution of Kir4.1 in hippocampi from patients with medication-refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. The selectivity of the antibody was confirmed in mice with a glial conditional deletion of the gene encoding Kir4.1. These mice showed a complete loss of labeled cells, indicating that Kir4.1 is restricted to glia. In human cases, Kir4.1 immunoreactivity observed in cells morphologically consistent with astrocytes was significantly reduced in 12 patients with hippocampal sclerosis versus 11 patients without sclerosis and 4 normal autopsy controls. Loss of astrocytic Kir4.1 immunoreactivity was most pronounced around vessels and was restricted to gliotic areas. Loss of Kir4.1 expression was associated with loss of dystrophin and alpha-syntrophin, but not with loss of beta-dystroglycan, suggesting partial disruption of the dystrophin- associated protein complex. The changes identified in patients with hippocampal sclerosis likely interfere with K+ homeostasis and may contribute to the epileptogenicity of the sclerotic hippocampus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据